AMAT leverage risk climbs to 72/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: -8.77% annualized.
- •AMAT leads with 72 leverage risk.
- •1 market covered · data as of Jul 6, 2026.
| Coin | Funding APR | Pctile 90d | Open interest | OI 24h | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -8.77% | 11 | $3.2M | n/a | 72 |
Funding deeply inverted
AMAT is trading with a distinctly bearish funding environment. The aggregated funding rate across exchanges stands at -8.77%, meaning shorts are extracting payment from longs—a structural signal that the market is positioned more heavily to the short side. This inversion is not marginal; it represents meaningful compensation flowing from leveraged long positions to those betting downward. When funding turns negative at this magnitude, it typically reflects either conviction among short players or, conversely, a dearth of long demand willing to sustain elevated leverage. The -8.77% annualized rate creates a friction cost for any trader maintaining a leveraged long exposure, effectively a daily tax on bullish positions.
What makes this funding picture especially revealing is its placement within AMAT's own 90-day distribution. The funding percentile of 11 indicates that current conditions sit well below the median of recent history—this is the 11th percentile, meaning roughly nine-tenths of the past three months saw funding rates less negative, or even positive. In other words, the current -8.77% represents a relatively extreme reading *for this specific asset*. The market is not merely tilted short; it is tilted short in a way that exceeds what AMAT has typically experienced recently.
A funding rate of -8.77% at the 11th percentile signals shorts commanding an unusually stretched premium over longs for this asset.
Open interest rising into headwinds
The week-long trajectory of open interest tells a directional story. Over the past seven days, OI has increased by 12.3%, meaning total leveraged notional exposure has grown despite the bearish funding backdrop. This is the behavior of a market adding leverage *into* a short-biased structure—a signal that either new capital is being deployed with short conviction, or existing shorts are pyramiding their positions upward. The current open interest stands at $3.2M notional.
The 24-hour open interest change is recorded as n/a, which prevents a reading of the most recent session's direction. However, the seven-day context is sufficient to establish momentum. Traders are building positions into an environment where funding rates penalize longs and reward shorts. This combination—negative funding combined with rising open interest—typically suggests confidence in the short thesis or, less charitably, vulnerability to a funding reversal if long demand suddenly resurfaces.
Liquidations balanced at the margin
The liquidation imbalance metric shows +0.00 over the past 24 hours, indicating a perfect neutral split between long and short liquidations. Neither side has experienced a pronounced cascade of forced exits. This equilibrium is notable in the context of rising open interest and inverted funding; it suggests that the market, while increasingly leveraged and structured to the short side, has not yet reached a point of acute fragility. Positions are being held and added rather than involuntarily closed.
This neutrality, however, deserves caution: it is a snapshot of the prior 24 hours. A shift in price or a sudden reversal in funding could quickly rebalance the liquidation picture, especially given the leverage risk score discussed below.
Leverage positioning remains elevated
The leverage risk score of 72 places AMAT in elevated territory on a zero-to-one-hundred scale. This composite measure reflects the fragility embedded in the current positioning structure—the combination of open interest size, rate of change, funding inversion, and liquidation sensitivity all compiled into a single gauge of how crowded or brittle leverage has become. A score of 72 is not at the extreme, but it is firmly in the upper half, indicating that the current environment carries material structural risk should the funding narrative reverse or price move against the dominant short positioning.
The score of 72 paired with -8.77% funding and an 11th percentile reading suggests a market that has become increasingly convinced of a particular directional bias, and has extended leverage into that conviction. The rising open interest reinforces this: capital is *actively flowing into* a crowded setup rather than fleeing it.
The composite picture
AMAT's leverage landscape presents a market structure tilted decisively toward the short side, with shorts extracting premium from longs at rates elevated for this asset, and new open interest building into that configuration. The leverage risk score of 72 reflects the concentration of this positioning. The neutrality in liquidation imbalance provides no relief; it simply means that, for now, forced exits are not cascading. That stability is fragile should conviction reverse.
What would change this read
The current interpretation rests on three pillars: the inverted funding rate remaining negative, open interest continuing to grow or holding its recent gains, and the leverage risk score remaining elevated. If funding normalized—shifting from -8.77% toward zero or positive territory—it would signal shorts releasing premium and shorts potentially covering, a critical reversal. If open interest began to decline materially over the next seven days, it would indicate deleveraging and reduced conviction in the short setup. If the liquidation imbalance flipped sharply negative, signaling a wave of short liquidations, it would reveal fragility in the crowded positioning and imply rapid unwinding. Any one of these moves would substantially alter the leverage risk profile and invalidate the current stretched-positioning narrative.
How to read this
| Funding APR | Annualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs). |
| Percentile 90d | Where current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100). |
| Open interest | Total USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts. |
| OI change 24h / 7d | How fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period. |
| Liquidation skew | Imbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts. |
| Leverage risk | 0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility. |
Read next
WEN leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
YFI leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: -104.98% annualized.
FLEX leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
Priya manages Quantority's exchange and product reviews, comparing fees, leverage limits and liquidity. Her ratings are editorial and kept independent of any affiliate arrangements.
The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.
Get the brief on Telegram →This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.