AVAAI funding hits 32.07% APR as longs crowd the market
Funding sits at the 100th percentile of AVAAI's own 90-day range, with $1.7M of open interest at stake.
- •AVAAI leads with 88 leverage risk.
- •1 market covered · data as of Jul 6, 2026.
| Coin | Funding APR | Pctile 90d | Open interest | OI 24h | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.07% | 100 | $1.7M | n/a | 88 |
Funding at the extreme
AVAAI is signaling an unusually crowded long positioning through its funding rate structure. The aggregated funding APR stands at 32.07%, indicating that longs are paying shorts at a substantial rate. More tellingly, this funding level sits at the 100 percentile of the last 90 days—meaning current rates represent the highest point observed in that entire window. This is not a moderate elevation or a cyclical peak; it is the extreme edge of recent history for this asset.
AVAAI's 32.07% funding at the 100th percentile of its 90-day range signals maximum crowding of long leverage in recent memory.
When funding reaches the top of a 90-day distribution, it typically reflects a market in which buyers have grown confident, leverage has accumulated, and the cost of holding a long position has become exceptionally expensive relative to recent norms. The persistence of such rates usually attracts arbitrage and short-side entry, but the fact that AVAAI has reached this point indicates that demand for longs—likely driven by conviction, momentum, or retail participation—has outpaced the natural mean-reversion mechanisms.
Open interest and leverage momentum
Open interest in AVAAI stands at $1.7M, a modest notional size compared to major derivatives ecosystems. The 24-hour change in OI is listed as unavailable, which limits real-time assessment of intraday positioning shifts. However, the 7-day change is available and shows a +1.4% increase. This means that over the past week, aggregate leverage has edged higher rather than rolling off, consistent with a market in which new longs are being added even as funding costs climb.
This behavior—rising OI paired with extreme funding—suggests that buyers are not yet deterred by the cost of leverage. In healthier conditions, steep funding would trigger either position-taking by shorts or unwinding by marginal longs. The fact that OI has grown modestly over seven days instead indicates that the long bias remains intact and is expanding incrementally. For a small notional market like $1.7M, such moves may reflect individual or small-cluster positioning rather than broad institutional consensus, amplifying the fragility of the setup.
Liquidation dynamics and balance
The liquidation imbalance metric for the 24-hour period is +0.00, indicating an exact balance between long and short liquidations over that timeframe. While this suggests equilibrium in the immediate term, it is worth noting that liquidation activity is often lagged; clusters of underwater positions may not flash liquidate simultaneously. The balance itself does not rule out hidden fragility in the long stack, especially given the high funding rate and the recruitment of fresh leverage.
The neutrality of liquidation dynamics also means that we lack a warning signal from forced exits. In markets where leverage is truly breaking, liquidation imbalance tends to skew sharply in one direction. AVAAI's zero imbalance may reflect either genuine balance or the simple fact that large liquidations have not yet been triggered. Combined with rising OI and extreme funding, the former interpretation seems less convincing.
Leverage risk score and fragility
The leverage risk score for AVAAI is 88, placing it in the elevated band of fragility. This composite measure incorporates funding intensity, OI momentum, liquidation risk, and crowding signals. A score of 88 out of 100 does not suggest imminent systemic collapse, but it does reflect a market structure that is materially stretched and vulnerable to perturbations.
The score aligns logically with the other signals: extreme funding (32.07% at the 100th percentile), modest but positive OI growth (+1.4% over seven days), and a small absolute notional base ($1.7M) that can amplify volatility and clustering risk. When a derivative market is both expensive to hold long and growing in size, the score correctly identifies this as a configuration in which unwinding or reversal would expose positions quickly.
What would change this read
The current assessment of stretched positioning in AVAAI would be invalidated by concrete shifts in the underlying metrics. A decline in the aggregated funding rate—moving away from the 32.07% level—would signal that the cost of carrying longs is normalizing, reducing the pressure that sustains crowding. A reversal in the 7-day open interest trend, shifting from +1.4% to a negative figure, would indicate that leverage is being reduced rather than accumulated, easing the mechanical fragility of the setup.
Alternatively, if liquidation imbalance shifted meaningfully negative—showing more short liquidations than long—it would suggest that the long side is being forced to cover, likely due to adverse price movement, which would mechanically reduce leverage and relieve tension. Finally, a material decline in the leverage risk score below the current 88 would indicate that multiple dimensions of the crowding signal had reversed simultaneously. Until one or more of these conditions materialize, AVAAI remains in a state of elevated positioning strain.
How to read this
| Funding APR | Annualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs). |
| Percentile 90d | Where current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100). |
| Open interest | Total USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts. |
| OI change 24h / 7d | How fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period. |
| Liquidation skew | Imbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts. |
| Leverage risk | 0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility. |
Read next
WEN leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
YFI leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: -104.98% annualized.
FLEX leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
Yusuf leads Quantority's risk and methodology work, covering margin frameworks, liquidation mechanics and the limits of each metric. He stresses that figures are descriptive, not predictive.
The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.
Get the brief on Telegram →This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.