CC leverage spotlight
A focused read on CC perpetual-futures positioning.
- •CC leads with 47 leverage risk.
- •1 market covered · data as of Jun 20, 2026.
| Coin | Funding APR | Pctile 90d | Open interest | OI 24h | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -16.62% | 6 | $14.1M | n/a | 47 |
Funding Dynamics Signal Short Dominance
CC's funding rate presents a notably inverted picture relative to typical market conditions. The aggregated funding APR stands at -16.62%, indicating that short sellers are actively paying long positions to maintain their leverage. This negative funding environment has persisted long enough to become structurally embedded in the market microstructure, suggesting persistent bearish sentiment among leveraged traders. When shorts must compensate longs to sustain their positions, it signals conviction among the short-side community—yet such arrangements also contain inherent fragility, as sustained negative funding can eventually exhaust short-side capital or trigger profit-taking reversals.
The -16.62% rate, when contextualized through the funding percentile of 6, reveals the most striking aspect of CC's current leverage posture. This percentile indicates that over the trailing ninety days, CC's funding rate sits at an extreme lower tail—only 6 out of 100 days registered more negative funding than today. In other words, the current short-funding regime is among the most stretched conditions CC has experienced in recent months. This positioning suggests that shorts have grown increasingly confident, or alternatively, that they have built positions at an accelerating pace. Either interpretation points to leverage that has extended into uncommon territory for this particular asset.
Open Interest and Momentum Constraints
The total open interest in CC stands at $14.1M, a notional size that frames the scale of derivatives positioning relative to broader market activity. While open interest figures alone do not indicate leverage danger—positioning can be stable or unstable at any absolute size—the inability to track intraday or weekly momentum limits the precision of this analysis. Both oi_change_24h and oi_change_7d are reported as n/a, preventing observation of whether positions are actively expanding, consolidating, or contracting. This absence complicates assessment of whether the current short-funded environment reflects fresh leverage accumulation or a stable state achieved over prior weeks.
Without visibility into recent open interest trends, interpretation must rely on the funding rate and liquidation data as proxies for directional momentum. The -16.62% funding and the percentile of 6 suggest sustained short positioning, but the lack of OI velocity metrics means traders cannot easily discern whether this represents a crowded rush into shorts or a calcified market structure. In such circumstances, the risk lies in binary outcomes: either shorts gradually extract profits and unwind, allowing funding to normalize, or a sudden price movement could trigger cascading liquidations among positions built during the extremist funding period.
Liquidation Imbalance and Structural Stress
CC's liquidation imbalance over the past twenty-four hours reached -1.00, a figure that demands careful interpretation. This value indicates that 100% of liquidations in the measurement window occurred on the short side, with zero long liquidations recorded. A liquidation imbalance of -1.00 is an extreme reading, signifying complete directional skew in how leverage is being flushed from the market. Unlike more balanced markets where both sides experience periodic forced exits, CC exhibited a one-sided liquidation profile.
This pattern carries dual implications. On one hand, it may suggest that shorts have been caught off-guard by price strength, forcing position exits. On the other hand, if measured during a period of stable or slightly rising prices, it could reflect the natural exit of short-side leverage as trades mature or traders become risk-averse. The extreme -1.00 score, however, underscores fragility within the short-sided structure: positions built during the -16.62% funding environment appear sensitive to adverse price moves, and the market may lack sufficient long-side cushioning to absorb large unwinding events smoothly.
Aggregate Risk Assessment
The leverage risk score of 47 provides a composite view of CC's positioning fragility. Scoring on a zero-to-one-hundred scale where higher values indicate greater risk, a score of 47 places CC in the moderate range—neither comfortably low nor acutely elevated. This middling score reflects the tension between several warning signs and mitigating factors. The extreme funding percentile of 6 and the one-sided liquidation imbalance of -1.00 push the risk assessment upward, while the moderate absolute size of open interest and the absence of confirmed recent leverage growth prevent the score from reaching critical levels.
Taken together, CC's leverage profile presents a market characterized by stretched short positioning and demonstrated sensitivity to price reversals, yet without clear evidence of explosive new leverage accumulation. The -16.62% funding at the ninety-day percentile of 6 signals that shorts have extended into uncomfortable territory. The -1.00 liquidation imbalance confirms that this extended positioning has already experienced shock moments. Traders monitoring CC should remain attentive to funding normalization and OI momentum data when such metrics resume reporting, as these will determine whether the current extremism represents a sustainable equilibrium or a precursor to structural dislocation.
How to read this
| Funding APR | Annualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs). |
| Percentile 90d | Where current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100). |
| Open interest | Total USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts. |
| OI change 24h / 7d | How fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period. |
| Liquidation skew | Imbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts. |
| Leverage risk | 0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility. |
Read next
WEN leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
YFI leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: -104.98% annualized.
FLEX leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
Priya manages Quantority's exchange and product reviews, comparing fees, leverage limits and liquidity. Her ratings are editorial and kept independent of any affiliate arrangements.
The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.
Get the brief on Telegram →This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.