Quantority
Spotlight

HIMS leverage risk climbs to 71/100

Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.

Priya Nair· Jul 6, 2026 · 4 min read
Share
Spotlight
+0.00% fundingHIMS logoHIMS
Quick take
  • HIMS leads with 71 leverage risk.
  • 1 market covered · data as of Jul 6, 2026.
Markets in this report · as of Jul 6, 2026
CoinFunding APRPctile 90dOpen interestOI 24hRisk
HIMS logoHIMS0.00%
$200,670n/a71

Funding signals neutral ground

HIMS presents an unusually flat funding landscape as of 2026-07-06. The aggregated funding rate stands at 0.00%, indicating perfect equilibrium between long and short positions—neither side is paying the other. This neutrality is noteworthy in itself. Funding rates typically oscillate above and below zero as trader conviction shifts; a precise zero suggests the market has reached a temporary balance point, or that positioning is sufficiently distributed across exchanges that no systematic pressure favors one directional bias. Without historical context, the 0.00% rate alone appears calm, even stabilizing. However, the absence of a 90-day percentile reading—marked as n/a—prevents direct comparison against HIMS's own recent funding behavior, limiting our ability to determine whether this neutrality is routine or a departure from recent extremes.

The funding rate of 0.00% paired with a leverage risk score of 71 reveals a market that has cooled structurally while retaining elevated fragility.

Open interest contraction under way

The open interest in HIMS stands at $200,670, a modest absolute notional figure reflecting either a smaller or emerging derivatives market for the asset. More instructive is the directional signal: over the past seven days, open interest has declined 12.7%. This contraction points to active deleveraging—traders are closing positions rather than adding to them. The 24-hour change is unavailable, so we cannot assess whether this pullback accelerated or decelerated most recently, but the weekly trend is unambiguous. When open interest falls, especially at this rate, it typically means leverage is being unwound, risk is being taken off the table, and the market is preparing for either lower volatility or repositioning away from crowded bets.

This deleveraging is consistent with the neutral funding rate. As longs and shorts both reduce exposure proportionally, funding pressure dissipates because neither side is dominant. The $200,670 total open interest is not large by crypto derivatives standards, which suggests HIMS may be a smaller-cap or newer listing where absolute positioning volumes remain constrained; this can amplify volatility per unit of flow but does not necessarily imply structural fragility when measured in isolation.

Liquidation balance remains even-keeled

The liquidation imbalance metric registered at +0.00 over the 24-hour period, indicating no net directional cascade. Neither longs nor shorts experienced a systematic liquidation wave; positions appear to be closing voluntarily or naturally expiring rather than being forcibly liquidated due to price movement or leverage breach. This symmetry reinforces the picture of a market in equilibrium. Absent a sharp move or sudden volatility spike, the near-term liquidation cascade risk—a hallmark of crowded leverage—is not evident. Longs and shorts are exiting at comparable rates, or the market is simply too small to register significant liquidation imbalance at any given moment.

Elevated leverage risk despite calm surface

The leverage risk score for HIMS is 71—an elevated reading on the 0-100 scale. This is the crucial tension in the data. While funding is flat, open interest is contracting, and liquidations are balanced, the composite risk score suggests the *remaining* positioning retains structural fragility. A score of 71 implies that whatever leverage is still deployed is concentrated or brittle relative to recent market conditions for the asset. This mismatch—calm surface metrics paired with elevated fragility—often precedes sharp repricing when catalyst or volatility accelerates.

The high risk score may reflect that the positions still open are held at higher leverage multiples, or that they are concentrated among fewer market participants, or that historical volatility and margin requirements for HIMS make current nominal open interest more fragile than surface notional suggests. The fact that deleveraging is ongoing (the 12.7% weekly decline) but the risk score remains at 71 suggests that traders who *remain* in the market are riding tighter margins than average.

Market state and forward implications

HIMS derivatives positioning is in a transitional state. The neutral funding, declining open interest, and even liquidation profile paint a picture of a market unwinding excess leverage. However, the leverage risk score of 71 signals that the market has not yet fully normalized; meaningful positions remain under strain. This combination is consistent with a market that has recognized excess and is beginning to reduce it, but has not yet reached a stable, low-fragility equilibrium.

What would change this read

This analysis would shift materially if any of three conditions emerge. First, if the funding rate normalized below the current 0.00%—consistently negative—it would indicate shorts gaining structural dominance or longs exiting entirely, a bearish signal for leverage positioning. Second, if open interest reversed from contraction to expansion, especially if weekly declines turned to weekly gains, it would signal renewed confidence and leverage-building, potentially lifting the risk score higher. Third, if liquidation imbalance swung sharply positive or negative—meaning one side began experiencing forced exits—it would indicate that the underlying market had moved and leverage fragility was materializing into real losses. Any of these reversals would invalidate the current read of controlled deleveraging.

How to read this

Funding APRAnnualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs).
Percentile 90dWhere current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100).
Open interestTotal USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts.
OI change 24h / 7dHow fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period.
Liquidation skewImbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts.
Leverage risk0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility.

Read next

Exchange Reviews Lead · Quantority

Priya manages Quantority's exchange and product reviews, comparing fees, leverage limits and liquidity. Her ratings are editorial and kept independent of any affiliate arrangements.

The Funding Brief
Weekly derivatives brief

The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.

Get the brief on Telegram →
Disclosure: some exchange links are affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Data is for research only and is not financial advice.

This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.