Quantority
Spotlight

LIT leverage spotlight

A focused read on LIT perpetual-futures positioning.

Jonas Bergstrom· Jun 20, 2026 · 4 min read
Share
Spotlight
+0.01% fundingLIT logoLIT
Quick take
  • LIT leads with 49 leverage risk.
  • 1 market covered · data as of Jun 20, 2026.
Markets in this report · as of Jun 20, 2026
CoinFunding APRPctile 90dOpen interestOI 24hRisk
LIT logoLIT-2.44%
$33.1Mn/a49

Funding Rate Signals Modest Short Bias

LIT's aggregated funding rate stands at -2.44%, indicating that shorts are currently paying longs a small premium to hold their positions. This negative funding environment typically reflects mild bearish positioning or at least an absence of aggressive long accumulation. In absolute terms, -2.44% annualized is neither extreme nor negligible—it suggests a modest imbalance favoring short-side participants, but one without the sharp urgency that would accompany a crowded bearish reversal setup. The rate remains shallow enough that neither side faces acute funding pressure, leaving room for positioning to shift without triggering rapid unwinding.

What sharpens this picture, however, is the context provided by the funding percentile. At 12 on the 90-day scale, LIT's current funding rate sits in the lower tail of its recent range. This means that -2.44% is unusually *low* relative to where funding has typically resided over the past three months. In other words, shorts are paying longs less often and less aggressively than has been the norm for this asset. This percentile reading suggests that LIT has cycled away from crowded long positioning and toward a period of either neutral or short-leaning sentiment—a condition that historically can persist for some time before reversing into fresh long accumulation.

Open Interest and Momentum Constraints

The total open interest in LIT stands at $33.1M, a relatively modest notional size that reflects a thin but functioning derivatives market for this asset. The capital locked in leveraged positions is neither particularly large nor negligible, indicating that LIT attracts retail and institutional traders but has not yet consolidated into the heavyweight category occupied by major cap derivatives markets. This moderate scale is relevant to volatility and liquidation dynamics: smaller open interest pools can be more sensitive to sudden directional moves, yet also less prone to systemic cascades during unwinding.

Unfortunately, the 24-hour and 7-day open-interest change figures are unavailable, preventing a direct read on whether leverage is building or contracting in the short term. This data gap means we cannot yet determine whether the modest short-bias funding environment is being reinforced by fresh leverage entry or being eroded by position closure. The absence of these metrics is a meaningful limitation; tracking intra-week momentum in OI would normally clarify whether the current funding state represents a stable short overhang or a transient condition already reversing.

Liquidation Imbalance and Directional Stress

The liquidation imbalance figure of -1.00 over the past 24 hours is striking: it indicates that all liquidations on this interval were short-side closures, with zero long-side liquidations recorded. This extreme reading—the minimum possible value on a scale from -1 to +1—reveals that price action or mark-price movement over the last day cleanly favored longs, forcing shorts into liquidation while leaving long positions untouched. Such a skew does not necessarily signal weakness in the short thesis; rather, it reflects the mechanical result of a sharp upward move that hit shorts' stop-losses while longs rode gains.

The imbalance becomes more interpretable when considered alongside the funding rate. Shorts are paying longs, yet shorts are also being liquidated. This combination suggests that a previous short-heavy positioning wave has begun to unwind under adverse price action, even though funding has not yet swung sharply enough to discourage new shorts from entering. In essence, existing shorts are bleeding out while the economic incentive structure—the negative funding rate—has not yet become punitive enough to deter further shorting. This transient state often precedes either stabilization (if shorts hold the line) or a faster unwind (if shorts capitulate and fuel a rally).

Leverage Risk Assessment

LIT's leverage risk score of 49 places the asset in the moderate range—neither fragile nor robust. A score of 49 suggests that the current positioning environment is neither acutely crowded nor particularly complacent. This middling reading reflects the combination of modest short bias (negative funding), a thin open-interest base, and recent short liquidations. The risk score does not flash a warning of imminent cascade, but neither does it suggest comfortable positioning buffer.

Synthesis and Positioning Context

Taken together, LIT presents a nuanced leverage portrait. The negative funding rate and its position at the low end of the 90-day percentile imply that short interest has recently built and now occupies a modest premium. However, the -1.00 liquidation imbalance reveals that this short overhang is already under mechanical pressure from upward price movement. The moderate leverage risk score and thin absolute open interest reinforce the sense that positioning is extended but not yet unstable—a state that can flip quickly if price momentum persists or reverses abruptly.

The missing OI momentum data leaves unresolved whether new shorting is defending these levels or whether the short position is passively aging as liquidations chip away. For a complete picture, traders would benefit from updated 24-hour and 7-day open-interest change figures, which would clarify whether the current funding and liquidation dynamic represents a robust short setup or an early unwind.

How to read this

Funding APRAnnualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs).
Percentile 90dWhere current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100).
Open interestTotal USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts.
OI change 24h / 7dHow fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period.
Liquidation skewImbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts.
Leverage risk0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility.

Read next

Quantitative Analyst · Quantority

Jonas develops the metrics behind Quantority's screeners, with a background in statistical arbitrage and volatility modelling. He documents methodology so readers can reproduce every calculation.

The Funding Brief
Weekly derivatives brief

The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.

Get the brief on Telegram →
Disclosure: some exchange links are affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Data is for research only and is not financial advice.

This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.