STRK leverage spotlight
A focused read on STRK perpetual-futures positioning.
- •STRK leads with 36 leverage risk.
- •1 market covered · data as of Jun 20, 2026.
| Coin | Funding APR | Pctile 90d | Open interest | OI 24h | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.95% | 76 | $3.2M | n/a | 36 |
Funding Signals and Historical Context
STRK's aggregated funding rate stands at 10.95%, a notably elevated level that suggests persistent long positioning relative to shorts. When annualized funding reaches this threshold, it typically reflects sustained demand from traders willing to hold leveraged long exposure at a material carry cost. The funding percentile of 76 places this rate in the upper quartile of the asset's recent behavior over the past 90 days, meaning current conditions are stretched relative to STRK's own recent history. This isn't an extreme outlier—the percentile reading leaves room for further escalation—but it does signal that longs are paying shorts at a rate that exceeds what the market has typically seen in recent weeks.
The combination of a 10.95% funding rate and a 76 percentile ranking implies that while leveraged long interest has built meaningfully, we are not yet in the most crowded state the coin has experienced recently. Traders entering fresh long positions are absorbing a genuine premium. This environment rewards those collecting funding on short sides, but for new long entrants, the cost of carry has become a material consideration in risk-adjusted returns.
Open Interest and Momentum
At the time of this snapshot on June 20, 2026, STRK's total open interest measured $3.2M across aggregated exchange positions. Both the 24-hour and 7-day open interest changes are reported as n/a, preventing a direct read on whether leverage is actively building, stabilizing, or unwinding. This absence of momentum data is a notable limitation when assessing the trajectory of positioning.
Without visibility into whether open interest has grown or contracted over the past week, the analysis must treat the $3.2M figure as a static point rather than a trend. For investors seeking to confirm whether the elevated funding rate reflects fresh leverage addition or the persistence of older positions, the unavailable momentum metrics create a blind spot. In such cases, the funding rate itself becomes the primary signal: sustained high funding typically correlates with active leverage maintenance or new entry, but the magnitude of underlying position change remains opaque.
Liquidation Structure and Directional Risk
The liquidation imbalance for STRK stands at -1.00 over the past 24 hours, indicating that shorts were liquidated at twice the volume of longs during the reporting window. A reading of -1.00 represents the most extreme short-biased liquidation outcome, meaning every long liquidation was matched by an equivalent short liquidation, with net pressure falling on the short side of the market.
This pattern appears consistent with elevated long funding: if longs dominate open interest and command the funding premium, then price moves against those positions will clear them out disproportionately. The -1.00 imbalance suggests that market participants holding leveraged short exposure faced pressure within the 24-hour period, perhaps indicating a price move that challenged short-side risk management or stop levels. Over a longer observation window, this directional skew could signal latent vulnerability among short-side traders, though a single day's reading offers limited predictive power for future liquidation behavior.
Leverage Risk Assessment
STRK's leverage risk score of 36 places it in the lower-to-moderate range on a 0–100 scale, where higher scores indicate more fragile or crowded positioning. Despite the elevated 10.95% funding rate and the 76 percentile ranking, the risk composite has not climbed into the elevated bands that would suggest imminent systemic fragility. This moderate score reflects the fact that open interest at $3.2M is modest in absolute terms and the liquidation imbalance, while skewed, has not created a cascade effect that would signal explosive deleveraging risk.
The risk score of 36 therefore offers some reassurance relative to the funding signals alone. While longs are paying a meaningful premium to hold positions, the aggregate leverage footprint remains contained. This suggests that STRK has room for funding rates to rise further before positioning becomes critically crowded, and that a moderate correction would not necessarily trigger a violent liquidation spiral.
Synthesis and Positioning Context
The STRK data as of June 20, 2026 describes a market in which long leverage has accumulated to a point worthy of attention but not yet to a point of extreme crowding. The 10.95% funding rate, combined with the 76 percentile ranking, confirms that longs are overrepresented and bearing the cost of that imbalance. The -1.00 liquidation imbalance reinforces the directional tilt, showing that recent volatility has cleared more shorts than longs from the market.
Yet the moderate leverage risk score of 36 and the modest $3.2M open interest base suggest the positioning, while tilted, lacks the density and fragility that precedes acute deleveraging episodes. Traders holding long exposure face real funding drag, and those shorting benefit from the rate premium. The missing open interest momentum data leaves a gap in the narrative, but the available signals point to a market that is neither complacent nor acutely vulnerable, but rather in a controlled state of long-side accumulation.
How to read this
| Funding APR | Annualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs). |
| Percentile 90d | Where current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100). |
| Open interest | Total USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts. |
| OI change 24h / 7d | How fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period. |
| Liquidation skew | Imbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts. |
| Leverage risk | 0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility. |
Read next
WEN leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
YFI leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: -104.98% annualized.
FLEX leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
Amara oversees data integrity at Quantority, validating that every published figure traces back to the underlying serving tables and that automated commentary never invents numbers.
The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.
Get the brief on Telegram →This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.