SYRUP funding hits 10.95% APR as longs crowd the market
Funding sits at the 100th percentile of SYRUP's own 90-day range, with $4.7M of open interest at stake.
- •SYRUP leads with 89 leverage risk.
- •1 market covered · data as of Jul 6, 2026.
| Coin | Funding APR | Pctile 90d | Open interest | OI 24h | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.95% | 100 | $4.7M | n/a | 89 |
Funding at an extreme
SYRUP's aggregated funding rate stands at 10.95%, paired with a funding percentile of 100 across the last 90 days. This combination signals an exceptional state: not only are longs paying shorts at a rate more than ten percent annualized, but this rate sits at the absolute ceiling of the coin's recent history.
A funding percentile of 100 means SYRUP's current rate has not been exceeded once in the past 90 days—this is the highest crowding of long positioning the market has seen in that window.
When funding reaches such extremes, it typically reflects either genuine scarcity of short leverage or a flood of leveraged long demand that has overwhelmed supply. The 10.95% annual rate is substantial enough to erode margin on leveraged long positions materially over time. Shorts, by contrast, are being paid handsomely to hold their side. This dynamic persists only when conviction in continued upside is high enough to justify the cost, or when speculative fomo overwhelms risk management. Either way, positioning has become asymmetric and expensive for the dominant side.
Open interest under pressure
SYRUP's open interest sits at $4.7M notional across aggregated exchanges. Over the past seven days, this has contracted by 5.0%, suggesting that despite the elevated funding environment, participants are not aggressively adding leverage. The 24-hour change is unavailable, so intraday momentum cannot be assessed, but the weekly trend is clear: positioning is tightening, not expanding.
This is noteworthy because it decouples from the funding signal. Typically, when funding climbs to such heights, open interest either surges in response (more longs piling in, willing to pay) or stabilizes (shorts defending their premium). Instead, SYRUP's open interest is shrinking. This hints that some longs may be taking profits or closing positions despite the bullish funding narrative, or that liquidations and position squaring are outpacing new entry. The 5.0% contraction over seven days is moderate but consistent with a market that is beginning to acknowledge the unsustainability of the current rate.
Liquidation flows remain balanced
The liquidation imbalance over the past 24 hours registered at +0.00, indicating no directional skew in forced closures. Neither longs nor shorts faced disproportionate liquidation pressure in the last day. This near-perfect balance is somewhat surprising given the extreme funding environment, which typically produces cascading long liquidations as longs' margin thins under adverse conditions or sudden reversals.
The absence of a sharp liquidation skew does not mean the system is stable; it may simply mean that the extremes have not yet triggered the unwind. Longs holding at these funding rates are absorbing cost, and shorts are comfortable because they are paid to wait. Once a catalyst—whether a failed rally attempt, a sharp pullback, or simply exhaustion of bullish conviction—arrives, the liquidation structure may reverse quickly.
Leverage risk elevated
SYRUP's leverage risk score of 89 reflects an elevated, indeed concerning, state of fragility in the positioning structure. On a zero-to-one-hundred scale, 89 places the coin in the upper tier of leverage risk, signaling that the current configuration of open interest, funding, and imbalance creates structural vulnerability.
A score this high typically emerges when multiple conditions align: high funding (check), extreme funding percentile relative to recent history (check), and a liquidation environment that has not yet discharged the pressure. The score synthesizes these inputs into a composite warning: the market is overextended in one direction, and mean reversion or a reversal would likely trigger cascading forced closures.
The confluence and its implications
Taken together, these four signals paint a portrait of a market in an unsustainable state. Funding at 10.95% and a 100-percentile ranking show that longs are crowded and paying an extreme rate. Open interest contracting by 5.0% over seven days suggests that not all participants are willing to hold at this cost, creating a potential liquidity inflection point. Balanced liquidations so far imply the pressure has not yet released. And a leverage risk score of 89 flags the entire structure as fragile.
The implication is that SYRUP's current leverage landscape is stretched relative to its own recent past, and while the crowd has not yet begun to panic liquidate, the conditions are ripe for a sharp repricing should sentiment shift. The contraction in open interest is the earliest warning sign—participants are voting with their exit, even as funding remains punitive.
What would change this read
A normalization of aggregated funding toward single-digit or negative rates would immediately signal cooling of crowded long positioning. If open interest reversed its 7-day contraction and began expanding, it would suggest that the high funding is actually attracting fresh leverage rather than repelling it, which would extend the current extreme. Should liquidation imbalance shift sharply negative, indicating a wave of long closures, it would confirm that the fragility flagged by the risk score is being realized. A decline in the leverage risk score itself—moving materially lower than 89—would indicate that the combination of funding, percentile, and imbalance had become less explosive. Any of these shifts would warrant reassessment of SYRUP's leverage health.
How to read this
| Funding APR | Annualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs). |
| Percentile 90d | Where current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100). |
| Open interest | Total USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts. |
| OI change 24h / 7d | How fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period. |
| Liquidation skew | Imbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts. |
| Leverage risk | 0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility. |
Read next
WEN leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
YFI leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: -104.98% annualized.
FLEX leverage risk climbs to 100/100
Funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility, in one stretched read. Funding: 0.00% annualized.
Amara oversees data integrity at Quantority, validating that every published figure traces back to the underlying serving tables and that automated commentary never invents numbers.
The five most extreme funding & OI moves — one short email. No noise.
Get the brief on Telegram →This report is generated from Quantority's database; the figures are read from the data and the commentary is automated. Descriptive, not predictive, and not financial advice.