LA open interest jumps +282.6% in 24h — fresh leverage is entering
Total LA open interest now stands at $12.6M. Funding is -3310.18% annualized.

- •LA leads with 67 leverage risk.
- •1 market covered · data as of Jul 21, 2026.
| Coin | Funding APR | Pctile 90d | Open interest | OI 24h | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3310.18% | 0 | $12.6M | +282.6% | 67 |
LA is exhibiting one of the most polarized funding regimes on record, paired with explosive open-interest growth that suggests a market caught between violent deleveraging and fresh leverage entry. The combination of deeply negative funding, historically low funding percentile, rapid OI expansion, and elevated liquidation imbalance paints a portrait of positioning under acute stress—one where the next market move could trigger cascading exits.
Key takeaways
- Funding has collapsed to -3310.18% APR, placing it at the 0 percentile over 90 days—the lowest point in recent history for this pair.
- Open interest has surged +282.6% in the past 24 hours and +282.3% over seven days, indicating aggressive leverage buildup despite the extreme funding signal.
- Liquidation pressure is asymmetric: +0.50 imbalance over 24h shows longs are being liquidated at twice the rate of shorts.
- The leverage risk score stands at 67, reflecting elevated fragility in the current positioning structure.
The funding extremity
At -3310.18% APR, shorts are being paid aggressively by longs—a signal of maximum positioning stress.
LA's aggregated funding rate has reached extraordinary negative territory at -3310.18% annualized. This means long-position holders are paying shorts at a rate that, if annualized, would transfer capital at one of the most extreme rates observable in derivatives markets. For context, such a deep negative funding regime emerges only when shorts are heavily crowded and longs are either forced to hold at steep cost or are exiting in panic.
The funding percentile of 0 is the critical detail. This figure places today's funding at the absolute floor of the past 90 days of history for LA. There is no recent precedent for this degree of negative funding on this instrument. The market has not seen shorts this dominant, or longs this desperate to exit, in the trailing three months. This is not a temporary spike—it is a structural reordering of the funding curve to levels the LA pair has not touched in at least a quarter.
Open interest explosion amid extreme funding
What makes this situation particularly acute is that despite the terrifying funding signal, open interest has not contracted. Instead, it has expanded dramatically. Over the past 24 hours, open interest rose +282.6%. Over the trailing week, it climbed +282.3%. These are not modest rebalances; they represent nearly a tripling of notional positioning in both periods.
This divergence—collapsing funding paired with surging open interest—reveals a market split into two camps. One camp (likely longs) is being forced out by the extreme funding cost and is closing positions, contributing to the negative funding signal. The other camp is stepping in aggressively, adding fresh leverage. The net result is a much larger total open interest, $12.6M in notional size, built atop a powder keg of funding imbalance.
The technical implication is straightforward: the fresh leverage entering the market is either very confident in a directional move or is completely unaware of (or indifferent to) the funding signal screaming that current positioning is unsustainable. Either way, the OI structure is fragile.
Liquidation skew toward longs
The 24-hour liquidation imbalance of +0.50 indicates that over the period, longs have been liquidated at roughly twice the rate of shorts. This is consistent with what the funding rate implies: longs are under pressure, and at any meaningful price move against them, their margin cushions evaporate first.
Shorts, by contrast, are profitable on the funding spread and have room to weather adverse moves. The asymmetry in liquidations creates a cascade risk: if price moves sharply against longs, their liquidations could trigger a spiral that further pressures surviving long positions, drawing in more short entries and pushing funding even more negative. The +0.50 skew is not extreme on its own, but paired with the funding extremity and OI explosion, it signals that the market is primed for a unidirectional shakeout.
Elevated leverage risk composite
The leverage risk score of 67 reflects elevated fragility. This composite measure captures the interaction of all the above factors: extreme funding, recent OI history, liquidation asymmetry, and notional size. A score at this level does not predict direction; it predicts *instability*. Positions built on this foundation are sensitive to small shocks and prone to self-reinforcing unwinds.
What would change this read
The current read—acute leverage fragility—would be invalidated by a normalization in funding. If aggregated funding moved back toward zero or positive territory, it would signal that the long/short balance is stabilizing and fresh leverage is being absorbed without distress. A reversal in the 24-hour and 7-day open-interest momentum, from positive to negative, would show that the market is deleveraging rather than re-leveraging into the extremity. A rebalancing of the liquidation imbalance, moving closer to zero, would indicate that longs and shorts are exiting at comparable rates rather than along the current asymmetric path. Any of these shifts would suggest the positioning is becoming less fragile and the funding signal less actionable.
*Analysis generated from Quantority's live cross-exchange data pipeline. Descriptive market data, not a trade recommendation.*
Funding-spike and liquidation-cascade alerts the moment they fire, plus unlimited history and a REST API.
See what's in Pro→How to read this
| Funding APR | Annualized, OI-weighted funding. Positive = longs pay shorts (crowded longs). |
| Percentile 90d | Where current funding sits within the coin's own last 90 days (0–100). |
| Open interest | Total USD value of outstanding perpetual contracts. |
| OI change 24h / 7d | How fast leverage is entering (+) or unwinding (−) over the period. |
| Liquidation skew | Imbalance of forced closures (−1…1): + = more longs liquidated, − = more shorts. |
| Leverage risk | 0–100 composite of funding extremity, OI momentum, liquidations and volatility. |
Read next

Funding extremes: the most stretched perpetuals
Where cross-exchange funding sits furthest from neutral right now.

Highest leverage risk in crypto perpetuals right now
The coins our 0-100 leverage risk score flags as most stretched.

Open interest is building fastest in these markets
Where leverage is entering quickest, by 24h open-interest change.
Yusuf leads Quantority's risk and methodology work, covering margin frameworks, liquidation mechanics and the limits of each metric. He stresses that figures are descriptive, not predictive.
Stretched markets, building leverage and the research worth reading — one short email.
Every figure here is read directly from Quantority's cross-exchange data. This is descriptive market analysis — a read on positioning, not a forecast, and not financial advice.